From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Mon May 17 2004 - 06:26:40 GMT-3
But having delays between 120ms and 200ms means you have variations in the
delay (Jitter) which is bad for voip. It might be worth a try though ;)
--Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Yasser Abdullah [mailto:yasser@alharbitelecom.com]
Sent: lunes, 17 de mayo de 2004 8:53
To: ccie2002@bellsouth.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VOICE OVER IP DSL NEED HELP
120 - 200 ms? That's quite good dude. I run VOIP over satellite links with
delay up to 600 ms and it is still ok. :)
Regarding prioritizing your voip traffic, you won't lose anything if you do.
In the end, it depends on how congested is the ISP link.
Enjoy the free call :)
Yasser
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2002@bellsouth.net
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 6:19 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: VOICE OVER IP DSL NEED HELP
Hello ALL:
I was wondering if anyone has configured voip on a Cisco 1750 with a ADSL
WIC card. It appears that this is possible. However, was wondering if anyone
has used it for an overseas connection. (United States to Germany) What I am
trying to do is cut down on cost for my relative to call me from Overseas
(Germany). They are a little bit chatty.
Instead of using a pots line, would like my relative to pick up the phone in
Germany via the DSL connection and it will ring to my DSL connection in the
United States.
On the Germany side I would like to setup DHCP on my Cisco 1750 or 1720
router with voip configured. Would like to have the Germany router point to
my static ip DSL connection in the United States with a Cisco 1750 router
with voip configured also.
My concern/question is the delay between United States and Germany along
with the quality. I know I could make my voice traffic critical. However,
has anyone tried this. Would like to know if it is really worth it. I think
I should be ok in terms of delay. It appears my pings times router to router
should be about 120ms to 200ms. However, this is all theory. Never tried it.
Anyone have any suggestions on trying this ?
D
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:12 GMT-3