From: Yash Bajpai (ccieyash@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed May 12 2004 - 13:51:58 GMT-3
The Routers are connected back to back thru their aux
ports using a console cable. so, iam not dialing at
all. The other side does have 192.168.1.2
the point to point async link has not issues as far as
telnet, PING etc are concerned. it is running dynamic
routing protocol on that link is my issue.
--- CCIE# 12388 <Nettable_walker@hotmail.com> wrote:
> which side is dialing ?
> Also - do you have 192.168.1.1 on BOTH sides as you
> state ?
>
> Richard
> #12388
>
> //
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yash Bajpai" <ccieyash@yahoo.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:53 PM
> Subject: ospf over async interface
>
>
> > hello,
> >
> > this is my first email and i admit iam highly
> > intimidated by the complexity of some of the
> questions
> > posted.
> >
> > in any case, i have a seemingly simple issue with
> me.
> > i have two 2600 routers connected back to back
> using
> > the aux ports. i have the following configured on
> both
> > ends on the async.
> >
> > interface Async65
> > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
> > ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation ppp
> > async dynamic routing
> > async mode dedicated
> >
> > But no matter what i do, i cannot seem to get the
> ospf
> > adjaceny UP with its async neighbor. the "sh ip
> ospf
> > int" says the interface is passive. ofcourse, i
> have
> > not configured any interface as passive on either
> > router.
> >
> > anyone has any clues on what i might be missing
> here?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
> >
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:10 GMT-3