Re: Is trunking over WAN possible ?

From: Sachin Shenoy (sachinshenoy@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue May 11 2004 - 11:17:12 GMT-3


By WAN I meant Serial Link .... Leased Circuit !

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris" <clarson52@comcast.net>
To: "Chris" <clarson52@comcast.net>; "Sachin Shenoy"
<sachinshenoy@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: Is trunking over WAN possible ?

> Your subject says trunking over WAN but your topology shows a serial link
so
> I thought I should be clear and clarify.
>
>
> Yes you can do trunking over a WAN. No, I don't think you can do it over a
> serial link.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris" <clarson52@comcast.net>
> To: "Sachin Shenoy" <sachinshenoy@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Is trunking over WAN possible ?
>
>
> > I do not believe so unless there is some new technology I have not
caught
> up
> > with yet.
> > Also consider that every broadcast, some types of nic card errors and
etc.
> > would be propogated across the serial link.
> >
> > If you want to extend vlans you can use packet over sonet and I blieve
> there
> > are other methods relying on dynamic packet transport over fiber and
wdm.
> I
> > do not believe there is a way to do it over regular serial links but if
> > there is I would be very interested in hearing about them.
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sachin Shenoy" <sachinshenoy@hotmail.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:30 AM
> > Subject: Is trunking over WAN possible ?
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if trunking over WAN is possible ...
> > > What I mean by that is
> > >
> > >
> > > Serial Link
> > > SW1----R1<------------->R2--SW2
> > >
> > > Is it possible to trunk VLANs from SW1 to SW2 ???
> > > (So LAN IP ranges for VLANs on SW1 and SW2 will be the same !)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > SACHIN
> > >
> > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:09 GMT-3