From: Mohamed (nmohamed@cisco.com)
Date: Mon May 10 2004 - 03:34:15 GMT-3
Yeah ,
I also don't get your reqt,can you be bit more detial,I could try it.
Thanks
Mohamed.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Tony
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 12:43 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Bgp summary
Hi GS
Did anyone get this to work? I am having a hard time duplicating this
scenario:
Out of all the issues, my main concern is I can't get
rid of the aggregate /19 on R2 due to the dependency
of the inject-map command. If I filter the aggregate,
the inject-map WILL NOT WORK and I need it to work.
R1
197.68.1.0/24 <--I can't get rid of /24 cuz it is
classful
197.68.2.0/24
197.68.3.0/24
197.68.0.0/19 <--ok, used aggregate
R2
*>i197.68.0.0/19 <--how do you get rid of this as it
"seems" need it for the inject-map to work?
*>i197.68.0.0/16 <-ok, used inject-map
*>i197.68.1.0
*>i197.68.2.0
Note- use DL on R1 to get rid of 3.0
R6
*> 197.68.0.0/16 <--I can't get rid of cuz it is NOT
classful
Note- use DL on R2 to get rid of 1.0/2.0 and /19
TIA
############
r1-->r2.----R6
r1 send following route to R2
197.68.1.0/24,
197.68.2.0/24
197.68.3.0/24
197.68.0.0/19
In R2,after summarization, In BGP table we get
following routes
*> 192.68.0.0/16
*> 192.68.1.0
*> 192.68.2.0
Goal :
Only 197.68.0.0 should be appear in Bgp table of
R6--without /16 We cannot use summary command,suppres
route map at R2
##################
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:08 GMT-3