RE: Vlan issue

From: ccie (ccie@tisolutions.biz)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 13:23:54 GMT-3


because vlan 2 on the switch is set to tagged

I'm debugging ip packets and I'm seeing encapsulation failed

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
        Sent: 04 May 2004 17:04
        To: ccie
        Subject: RE: Vlan issue

        Also how do you know your 3Com is sending dot1Q frames ?

                -----Original Message-----
                From: ccie [mailto:ccie@tisolutions.biz]
                Sent: martes, 04 de mayo de 2004 17:51
                To: Richard Dumoulin
                Subject: RE: Vlan issue

                hi Richard

                I'm not to experienced with 3com's so how do I check?
                the 2600 is running 12.3.6 but I'm going to load 12.2.23
less bugs

                thanks

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Richard Dumoulin
[mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
                        Sent: 04 May 2004 16:32
                        To: ccie; ccielab@groupstudy.com
                        Subject: RE: Vlan issue

                        An interface fastethernet controller bugg on
your 2600 ? Is your 3Com negociating the trunk or not ?

                        --Richard

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: ccie [mailto:ccie@tisolutions.biz]
                        Sent: martes, 04 de mayo de 2004 17:15
                        To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                        Subject: OT: Vlan issue

                        Hi

                        This is the situation:

                        I have a 3com 4400 switch with 2 vlan (data and
voice) connecting to a single fast ethernet port on a 2600 router. I
have created sub interfaces with 802.1q encaps. First sub is in vlan 1
native and the second sub is in vlan 2 non native. When I ping a device
in vlan 2 i get and incomplete arp entry. Any ideas why....

                        I have tried adjusting the arp timeout and using
extended pings with a longer time between packets with no success.

                        Thanks

                        Ben

                        ________________________________________________

                        This email is confidential, may be legally
privileged and is for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure,
copying, distribution or reliance on any information it contains is
prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if received in
error and email confirmation to sender.

                        Please note that any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the views of tisolutions ltd.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:04 GMT-3