From: asadovnikov (asadovnikov@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Apr 21 2004 - 23:03:43 GMT-3
I do not see any requirements for wfq or wred on default class (not that it
is configured wrong), the rest looks good.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Lord, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 8:42 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: QoS Question
Hi Group,
Please can anyone assist with the following scenario......
There is a 2Mbit/sec interface on which the following outbound service
policy needs to be defined:
class VOICE - 500Mb LLQ
class SITEX - must not transmit more than 128kb even when there is no
congestion on the interface. When the interface becomes congested 128kb of
bandwidth must be available to this class if it needs it. When this class
does not need 128kb of bandwidth the surplus should be made available to
other classes.
class class-default - remainder of bandwidth.
To achieve the SITEX specification is it permissible and/or appropriate to
use both the "police" and "bandwidth" commands together?
policy-map SERVICE
class VOICE
priority 500
class SITEX
police 128000 conform transmit exceed drop
bandwidth 128
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
Thanks in anticipation,
Chris.
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for
the recipient only. If you have received it in error, please notify us
immediately by reply email and then delete it from your system. Please do
not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any
other person or store or copy this information in any medium. The views
contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of
Lorien plc.
Thank you for your co-operation.
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:52 GMT-3