From: Tim Last (packtmon@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Apr 20 2004 - 17:52:09 GMT-3
If they both work, then there's no difference in effect. What I mean by "if they both work" is that the "frame-relay class FRTS_R5" statement might not be allowed on a p2p subinterface although I can tell you it's definately allowed on a p2m subinterface. On a p2p sub, you may have to use the 1st method from your example.
There's an excellent tutorial on this at http://www.internetworkexpert.com/index.htm
I would study Brian's presentation thoroughly. It's the best I've ever seen on FRTS.
HTH
C.Sammarcellino@sirtisistemi.it wrote:
What is the difference betwen the two following configuration.
Conf: A
interface Serial0/0.52 point-to-point
ip address 138.10.25.1 255.255.255.252
ip router isis
frame-relay interface-dlci 501
class FRTS_R5
Conf: B
interface Serial0/0.52 point-to-point
ip address 138.10.25.1 255.255.255.252
ip router isis
frame-relay class FRTS_R5
frame-relay interface-dlci 501
where map-class is:
map-class frame-relay FRTS_R5
frame-relay cir 128000
frame-relay bc 128000
frame-relay mincir 64000
frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
frame-relay priority-group 1
priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp telnet
Bye
Ciro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:51 GMT-3