From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Wed Apr 14 2004 - 16:37:34 GMT-3
Nor did I, but Brian did post the question. I did a quick search but found
nothing ...
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Skinner [mailto:stephen_ski@hotmail.com]
Sent: miircoles, 14 de abril de 2004 16:29
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: dot1Q
Ok
i`ll bite ,
how would your trunk encapsulation fail ...
i.e without playing with the config
i `ve seen a link go down ...ive seen a trunk go done ....but i have never
seen a trunk encap just fail
steve
>From: Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
>Reply-To: Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
>To: Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>, "W. Alan Robertson"
><warobertson@earthlink.net>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: dot1Q
>Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 01:58:28 +0100
>
>One possible reason may be a media that cannot support the size of a
>tagged frame ? Here only untagged frames would pass.
>
>--Richard
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian McGahan [mailto:bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com]
>Sent: viernes, 09 de abril de 2004 2:56
>To: Richard Dumoulin; W. Alan Robertson
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: dot1Q
>
>
>How exactly does "encapsulation failure" occur?
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>Of
> > Richard Dumoulin
> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 7:34 PM
> > To: W. Alan Robertson
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: dot1Q
> >
> > Yes, I guess "encapsulation failure" does not mean "trunk failure"
> > at
>all
> > !!
> > I would have lost all the points in a simple question :((
> >
> > So lab tip: read all the words of every question, hehe.
> >
> > --Richard
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:warobertson@earthlink.net]
> > Sent: viernes, 09 de abril de 2004 2:21
> > To: Richard Dumoulin
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: dot1Q
> >
> >
> > As I read the phrasing of the task requirements in your post, I
> > immediately thought "native vlan." Reading further, I took it to
> > mean "trunk encapsulation failure."
> >
> > I guess I still have a pretty good grasp of Cisco's pidgin "CCIE
> > English." ;)
> >
> >
> > Richard Dumoulin wrote:
> >
> > >A simple question that confuses me: I am asked to configure
> > >trunking between two 3550. I m also asked to "ensure that VLAN X is
> > >still forwarded accross the link if the encapsulation fails". Does
> > >"encapsulation fails" mean "stops trunking" ? Or something else ?
> > >
> > >So I did configure "switchport access vlan X" but the solution
> > >shows "switchport trunk native vlan X" !?!?
> > >
> > >The doc-cd says about "switchport access vlan X" that if the link
>stops
> > >trunking then it will only forward X.
> > >
> > >Does anyone agree with me ?
> > >
> > >By the way, this is CCBootcamp task 2-h lab3,
> > >
> > >Regards
> > >
> > >--Richard
> > >
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >__
> > >Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
>from:
> > >http://shop.groupstudy.com
> > >
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
>_______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
>from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:47 GMT-3