From: Tim Last (packtmon@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Apr 10 2004 - 12:09:52 GMT-3
Hi Howard and GS,
I like your sense of humor.
I found something more interesting than packets that trigger dial.
A contradiction re: DHCP
According to Doc CD, either conflict checking must be disabled or a database agent must be configured.
According to the Cisco Cookbook, neither must be done - by default the bindings db is stored on router.
Who's correct and can this be verified without a dhcp client?
PS: I always find contrdictions interesting even if annoying.
Thanks, Tim
"Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:
At 11:33 PM -0400 4/9/04, Scott Morris wrote:
>heheheh... no problems, glad I could help.
>
>Yes, yes and yes...
>
>I believe you have it now!
>
>Guess that means you get to move onto to something more exciting now! (grin)
>
>
It often frightens me, with respect to our technical culture, that we
find traffic that triggers dial to be "interesting". What kind of
packet can only be dull and boring?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:45 GMT-3