From: Lupi, Guy (Guy.Lupi@eurekanetworks.net)
Date: Fri Apr 09 2004 - 10:57:42 GMT-3
The only way for NAT to function is to have at least one inside and one
outside interface, so if you have NAT running on a router you will always
have an interface with the "ip nat inside" statement on it.
This doesn't apply at all if there is no NAT on the router, or perhaps I am
not understanding your question?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Hurtado [mailto:dei2viccie@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 8:51 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: NAT and ip routing sequence order
Hello everybody,
Reviewing the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
094430.shtml
I have read this statement:
Note: When a packet is going from inside to outside, it is routed and then
translated (NAT). In the opposite direction (outside to inside), NAT takes
place first.
Is it always valid or is only applicable to "ip nat inside"?
Thanks for the help
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:44 GMT-3