From: Joseph D. Phillips (jphillips@ufcwdrugtrust.org)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 14:56:05 GMT-3
Ideally. Others may disagree, but I believe best-practice is to use static mappings. If you turn off inverse-arp on the natural interface and use frame-relay map statements, the extra DLCI mappings should disappear upon restart.
I had a real nasty OSPF problem because of extraneous DLCI mappings once. It's a good idea on the exam to make sure they're not there.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edwards, Andrew M [mailto:andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 10:48
To: Joseph D. Phillips
Subject: RE: Superfluous DLCI mappings
This has an implication I want to ask about...
So if I disable frame-relay inverse-arp on the physical interface and
reboot the router, then do a show frame pvc the list should be blank and
the only frame maps I'll have are those I statically define...? True?
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph D. Phillips [mailto:jphillips@ufcwdrugtrust.org]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:57 AM
To: Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Superfluous DLCI mappings
You can manually disable frame-relay inverse ARP for each DLCI.
no frame-relay inverse-arp ip (DLCI)
After rebooting the router, the mapping for that DLCI should disappear.
That makes for a lot of extra config but it seems to work.
-----Original Message-----
From: Edwards, Andrew M [mailto:andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 09:10
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject:
Also,
How can you disable seeing all PVCs on a link except the ones you want
to see? E.g. show frame map only shows the dlci's you have physically
mapped...?
I tried going to physical interface and disabling frame-relay inversea
arp and also no arp frame-relay... but I got additional mappings in the
show frame map statement that I did not statically define. Any ideas?
andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:42 GMT-3