RE: NAT qn

From: Jasper van Nederpelt (jasper.vannederpelt@imtech.nl)
Date: Tue Mar 23 2004 - 17:49:34 GMT-3


Kian,

Think you need the following solution:

Earlier in ASET lab 3 you had to redistribute 170.100.20.0, because no area
is specified for that network. The best thing to do that, is with a
redistribute connected with a route-map. In the route-map use the "match
interface Fa0/0". Handy thing about this is, if you put the 170.100.59.0 on
Fa0/0 as a secondary, he gets redistributed too... so you're nat pool is
know in the rest of your network.

Hope this is what you looked for.

Gr,
_______________________________
Jasper van Nederpelt
Senior Network Engineer

Imtech ICT Communication Solutions
Postbus 8706
3009 AS Rotterdam
Rivium Boulevard 112
2909 LK Capelle aan den IJssel

Telefoonnummer: +31 (0)10 447 77 77
Faxnummer: +31 (0)10 447 77 33

E-mail: jasper.vannederpelt@imtech.nl

                                                                                                                                       
                      "Kian Wah Lai"
                      <kian_wah_lai@az5 To: "'Wes Smith'" <wesmith@rogers.com>
                      .net> cc: "'R&S Groupstudy'" <rsg@synergy-networking.co.uk>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
                      Sent by: Subject: RE: NAT qn
                      nobody@groupstudy
                      .com
                                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                       
                      03/23/2004 01:20
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      "Kian Wah Lai"
                                                                                                                                       

From what I've seen, I don't think so.. what about the others?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Wes
Smith
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:33 AM
To: Kian Wah Lai
Cc: 'R&S Groupstudy'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: NAT qn

I wonder if NAT Outside vs inside would work....
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080

133ddd.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080

094c32.shtml

Kian Wah Lai wrote:

>Yes.
>That solved the problem ;) someone told me that a few minutes after I sent
>the email. Anyway, thanks.
>
>And sorry for the missing subject
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
R&S
>Groupstudy
>Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 6:15 PM
>To: Kian Wah Lai; 'Kian Wah Lai'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE:
>
>secondary address on the wan interface of router2?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Kian Wah Lai
>Sent: 21 March 2004 06:43
>To: 'Kian Wah Lai'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE:
>
>
>Didn't know they will remove the image. Basically, there is no interface
>using the 170.100.59.0/24 subnet and I have no idea how can I advertise
it.
>OSPF summary address or area range won't work, static routes are not
>allowed...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kian
>Wah Lai
>Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:16 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject:
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I have no idea how to do the 3rd part (no idea how to advertise the
route).
>I got this from Cisco ASET lab 3 and attached is the diagram.
>
>
>
>Configure NAT:
>
>. Configure NAT on R2 such that inside hosts leaving VLAN 2 toward the
Frame
>Relay cloud will be given
>
>an outside IP address in the range 170.100.59.2 through 170.100.59.4 with
a
>29-bit netmask. Use list
>
>number 20 for this task.
>
>. Make sure that all possible hosts within the VLAN 2 subnet could be
>supported by this NAT
>
>implementation.
>
>. Ensure that the other routers see the VLAN 2 170.100.20.x route as well
as
>the 170.100.59.0/24
>
>network.
>
>. You may not create a loopback interface or a static route to perform any
>NAT tasks.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Kian Wah Lai
>
>[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
R&S
>Lab Guide3.jpg]
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:45 GMT-3