I give up

From: Ahmed Mustafa (ahmed.mustafa@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Tue Mar 23 2004 - 01:03:59 GMT-3

Next message: Pun, Alec CL: "RE: OT : Does PIX support secondary IP ?"
Previous message: Wes Smith: "Re: Rspan between 2 3550's"
Next in thread: John Matijevic: "RE: I give up"
Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "RE: I give up"
Maybe reply: Vazman@aol.com: "Re: I give up"
Maybe reply: Ahmed Mustafa: "Re: I give up"
Maybe reply: afocusli@eml.cc: "Re: I give up"
Maybe reply: HP-France,ex2: "RE: I give up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Here is the basic configuration

R3 is connected to R6 over Ethernet network and connected to R1 over OSPF
network.

                                                   OSPF
RIPv2
                       R1----------------------------------------------------
----R3-------------------------------------------------R6
                         .1 191.1.13.0/24 .3
.3 204.12.1.0/24 .6

I am redistribuing between RIP and OSPF mutually on R3. Eventhough
204.12.1.0/24 is a directly connected network for R3, RIP technicall owns this
route.

I am not able to see 204.12.1.0/24 on R1, and I can't since I don't even see
that route on OSPF external database on R3.

I don't what I am doing wrong. Does someone have any idea? I will send
config later on if someone needs to look at it.

Regards,

Ahmed

Next message: Pun, Alec CL: "RE: OT : Does PIX support secondary IP ?"
Previous message: Wes Smith: "Re: Rspan between 2 3550's"
Next in thread: John Matijevic: "RE: I give up"
Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "RE: I give up"
Maybe reply: Vazman@aol.com: "Re: I give up"
Maybe reply: Ahmed Mustafa: "Re: I give up"
Maybe reply: afocusli@eml.cc: "Re: I give up"
Maybe reply: HP-France,ex2: "RE: I give up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:44 GMT-3