From: David Hiers (David_Hiers@adp.com)
Date: Sat Mar 20 2004 - 23:32:42 GMT-3
It's my understanding that in this case you'll lose the points for that section and any section that depends on the that section's functionality.
I believe the configs don't count at all, and that the end result as show by various show commands (except show run) is all that matters.
In general, it seems that you can afford to completely fail only the fluff sections (content switching, funky mcast) that are not depended on by any other section.
The inter-sectional dependencies seem carefully crafted to asynchronously transfer you to the retry queue if you fail any one of the core sections.
David
********************************************
David Hiers
CCIE, CISSP
ADP Dealer Services
2525 SW First Avenue
Portland, OR 97201
v: 503 652 4740
email: david_hiers@adp.com
********************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Packet Man [mailto:ccie2b@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 3:02 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Lab Scoring a Layer 2 problem
Hey team,
I recently took but didn't pass the lab. I won't violate the NDA, but I'm
wondering about how the scoring is done.
Let's suppose my pod is suppose to learn some routes from a BB router but I
don't configure the Layer 2 link between my router and the BB router
correctly resulting in my network not learning all the routes it's suppose
to.
However, let's also assume that I configured all the layer 3 stuff - routing
protocols, filters, redist, etc,etc - 100% correctly. Since, L2 isn't
working on 1 link between the BB router and my router, all my routing tables
will obviously be missing the routes it was suppose to learn from the BB
router in question.
So, here's the question: If layer 2 had been configured correctly, and all
layer 3 stuff was configured 100% correctly, how many points would be lost?
Would I lose just the 2 or 3 points assigned to the layer 2 task that wasn't
done correctly or would I lose alot more points?
Thanks in advanced, Packet Man
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:42 GMT-3