From: Marko Berend (marko.berend@storm.hr)
Date: Sat Mar 20 2004 - 05:58:26 GMT-3
Hi guys,
Well I did test it and localy originated telnet traffic does not get
marked when using service-policy under the interface.
Also I am talking only of marking, I didn't test bandwidth reservation.
class-map match-all telnet
match protocol telnet
class-map match-all ping
match protocol icmp
!
!
policy-map test
class telnet
set ip precedence 7
class ping
set ip precedence 1
class class-default
set ip precedence 2
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 139.10.45.4 255.255.255.0
service-policy output test
When I ping something on the Ethernet segment from the router, using a
sniffer, ping has tos of all zeros in stead of 1, in fact all values for
all traffic is unchanged.
Ip local policy with route map does the trick.
Hence my original question...
Thanks,
Marko
-----Original Message-----
From: SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)
[mailto:antonio.sanchez-monge@hp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 6:26 PM
To: 'William Chen'; Marko Berend; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Service-policy from the router
Hi William,
You are right, QoS does not follow the same rule as access lists. Easy
to test it, as you say. Am I getting lazy? I wasn't, maybe it's panic
before lab ;)
So Marko, forget my email.
Cheers,
Ato.
-----Original Message-----
From: William Chen [mailto:kwchen@netvigator.com]
Sent: viernes, 19 de marzo de 2004 18:21
To: SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2); 'Marko Berend';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Service-policy from the router
Hi,
If you think of Qos are mostly interface based. You've applied a
policy to reserve 20% bandwidth to telnet on an interface. Do you think
that the router will treat any difference between locally generated
telnet traffic with switched telnet traffic that will go out the same
interface?
It is very easy to lab it, and test it. :-)
Best Regards,
William Chen
----- Original Message -----
From: "SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)"
<antonio.sanchez-monge@hp.com>
To: "'Marko Berend'" <marko.berend@storm.hr>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 1:00 AM
Subject: RE: Service-policy from the router
> Hi Marko,
>
> Well with "ip local policy" you can specify a route-map which can do
> the marking ("set ip precedence ...").
>
> If you want more fancy QoS you can use PBR to redirect locally
> originated traffic to the loopback and use a service policy on it.
> Never tried it though (too many things to test and only 13 days to
> take the lab ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Ato.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Marko Berend
> Sent: jueves, 18 de marzo de 2004 11:16
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Service-policy from the router
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to enable servicing traffic originated on the router?
> Something like "ip local policy" for PBR?
>
> Specificaly I am interested in ways of marking router originated ip
traffic
> (ip precedence) with MQC if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Marko
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:40 GMT-3