From: Bill Santarsiero (Bill.Santarsiero@aqrcapital.com)
Date: Fri Mar 19 2004 - 22:44:21 GMT-3
Tried it without the route-map too. No luck. I am using a default-metric command instead.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Joseph D. Phillips
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:40 PM
To: Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Redistribution
Try not using a route-map first. It looks like you have a superfluous deny statement anyway.
Also, you haven't specified a metric. That alone could prevent the routes from showing.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Santarsiero [mailto:Bill.Santarsiero@aqrcapital.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 17:31
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FW: Redistribution
Don't know if anyone saw this because it got rejected the first time, so does anyone have any ideas??
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Santarsiero
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 2:27 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Redistribution
>
> Please look at the configuration on router 1 (local router). Question: Why are there no
> redistributions from BGP into EIGRP (see router 2's routing table)?
> Never tried redistributing from BGP into EIGRP. Never really used EIGRP. BTW, the
> statics and connected are fine. No BGP? Or am I missing something?
>
> Bill Santarsiero #6960
>
> router eigrp 2048
> redistribute connected
> redistribute static route-map DMZ-only
> redistribute bgp 2279 route-map Default-Only
> network 10.0.0.0
> default-metric 1000 100 255 1 1500
> no auto-summary
> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> !
> router bgp 2279
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> network 10.40.90.0 mask 255.255.255.0
> aggregate-address 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 summary-only
> neighbor 65.242.16.254 remote-as 2279
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 65.242.16.0 255.255.255.0 10.40.90.1
> ip route 192.168.110.0 255.255.255.0 10.40.90.1
> no ip http server
> !
> access-list 50 permit 65.242.16.0
> access-list 50 permit 192.168.110.0 0.0.0.255
> access-list 60 permit 0.0.0.0
> access-list 60 permit 192.168.200.0
> route-map Default-Only permit 10
> match ip address 60
> !
> route-map Default-Only deny 20
> !
> route-map DMZ-only permit 10
> match ip address 50
> !
> route-map DMZ-only deny 20
>
> Local Routing Table (router 1)
> Gateway of last resort is 65.242.16.254 to network 0.0.0.0
>
> S 192.168.110.0/24 [1/0] via 10.40.90.1
> 65.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> S 65.242.16.0 [1/0] via 10.40.90.1
> B 192.168.200.0/24 [200/0] via 65.242.16.254, 00:14:03
> 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 3 masks
> B 10.0.0.0/8 [200/0] via 0.0.0.0, 00:15:07, Null0
> C 10.40.60.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
> C 10.40.100.0/22 is directly connected, Vlan30
> C 10.40.90.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan20
> B* 0.0.0.0/0 [200/0] via 65.242.16.254, 00:14:03
>
>
> Downstream Routing table of router running eigrp (router 2).
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
> i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
> ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
> o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> D EX 192.168.110.0/24
> [170/2588160] via 10.40.60.254, 00:10:07, FastEthernet0/0
> 65.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 65.242.16.0 [170/2588160] via 10.40.60.254, 00:10:07, FastEthernet0/0
> 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 3 masks
> D EX 10.0.0.0/8 [170/2588160] via 10.40.60.254, 00:10:07, FastEthernet0/0
> C 10.40.60.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
> D 10.40.100.0/22 [90/28416] via 10.40.60.254, 00:10:07, FastEthernet0/0
> D 10.40.90.0/24 [90/28416] via 10.40.60.254, 00:10:07, FastEthernet0/0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:40 GMT-3