From: Sam Meftahi (SAF@sonofon.dk)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 06:17:11 GMT-3
Hi all
I might be missing the whole point here, pls do correct me.
When runing both OSPF and EIGRP on same router, mutually redistributing. If a loopback is added and then network is used to add it to OSPF process, it will not be advertised to EIGRP as the AD for it 0 and therefore OSPF will not redistribute it.
In this case, redistribute connected is needed. A rout-map is not needed unless filtering is specifically required.
Cheers
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Richard Dumoulin
Sent: 18. March 2004 08:56
To: Sally Crawford; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Redistribute connected route-map ?
Hi Sally, with OSPF I think that If you advertise networks by both "network"
and "redistribute connected" you'll have the same network in different
lsa's, external and router,
Regards
--Richard
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sally Crawford [mailto:crawford0982003@yahoo.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 18 de marzo de 2004 0:27
Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Redistribute connected route-map ?
Hi Team
When redistributing connected routes, do we have to create a route-map to
specify which connected interfaces are to be redistributed if the interface
is already been redistributed by another routing protocol ? Im confused,
some LABs im doing are inconsistent with its use of the route-map command.
Further , are there any issues that could arise by redistributing
interfaces via connected ( without route-map ) and the same interface via a
routing protocol. Or am I totally wrong and it depends on the routing
protocol. that I am redistributing the connected route into ?
Thanks All
Sally
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:34 GMT-3