From: Adel Abouchaev (adel@netmasterclass.net)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 16:40:15 GMT-3
Hello JBell,
Tuesday, March 16, 2004, 7:57:11 PM, you wrote:
J> You are not allowed to use summary route, I had thought of that already,
J> thanks anyway.
J> ----- Original Message -----
J> From: "Lee Donald" <Lee.Donald@bacs.co.uk>
J> To: "JBell" <Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com>; "ccie groupstudy com"
J> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
J> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:28 AM
J> Subject: RE: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
J> Use a summary route for 192.168.1.0.
J> Use the summary-address command under OSPF.
J> -----Original Message-----
J> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
J> JBell
J> Sent: 16 March 2004 23:14
J> To: ccie groupstudy com
J> Subject: Fw: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
J> ----- Original Message -----
J> From: JBell
J> To: ccie groupstudy com
J> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:11 PM
J> Subject: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
J> Hi Party People
J> Got a rip route problem. R1---r2----r3, r1/r2 are running rip and r2/3 are
J> running ospf. rip network is 200.10.10.0/24 and ospf network is
J> 192.168.1.0/24. How do I redistribute/filter so that r1 only receives a /16
J> route for the 192.168.1.0 network. I tried pre-fix list, which did not work.
J> I
J> think it has something to do with "reverse path".
J> I would really appreciate any help you can give me as I just cannot find a
J> solution.
J> Thanks alot...if you could jump on messenger a give me a quick tutorial it
J> would be even better.
J> Jbell.
J> Ms Jennifer Bellucci
J> Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com
J> **Note: Do not send file attachments without prior approval, as the E-mail
J> will be deleted, without being read. No attempt to contact the sender will
J> be
J> made.
J> ***This is for protection of both parties.
J> _______________________________________________________________________
J> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
J> http://shop.groupstudy.com
J> Subscription information may be found at:
J> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
J> -----------------------------------------------------
J> You can find us at www.bacs.co.uk
J> *****************************************************
J> This communication is confidential and intended for
J> the exclusive use of the addressee only. You should
J> not disclose its contents to any other person.
J> If you are not the intended recipient please notify
J> the sender named above immediately.
J> BACS Limited, registered in England, No 1023742,
J> 3 De Havilland Road, Edgware, Middlesex, HA8 5QA
J> *****************************************************
J> _______________________________________________________________________
J> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
J> http://shop.groupstudy.com
J> Subscription information may be found at:
J> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
If you can avoid redistribution, then create a loopback with an IP in
192.168.0.0/16 but not in the subnets that belong to R2 and R3, choose
something like 192.168.255.254 255.255.0.0, then plug it into OSPF,
use ip ospf network point-to-point under that loopback. This shall
solve it, unless you're restricted in creating new ip's/interfaces.
-- Best regards, Adel, CCIE# 12037 mailto:adel@netmasterclass.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:33 GMT-3