RE: class sequence in policy-map

From: HP-France,ex2 ("SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:15:47 GMT-3


Hi Wes,

Does that mean that UDP and RTP classes will not be used at all?

Cheers,
Ato.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Smith [mailto:wesmith@rogers.com]
Sent: miircoles, 17 de marzo de 2004 18:59
To: SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)
Cc: 'Aldo'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: class sequence in policy-map

Ato .. I've found that the policy-map is sequence dependant.
In this example, .. I don't think the UDP class would scoop all the RTP
traffic

SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2) wrote:

>Hi Aldo,
>
>With this policy map you are limiting bandwidth for data and reserving
>bandwidth for voice. These actions are completely compatible and the
>order does not affect the behaviour. In fact, limiting data would help
>voice to go through, but not the other way around. Anyway when you use
>MQC each class goes in a different queue and the only conflict comes
>when the total bandwidth reserved for the classes exceeds the
>reservable bandwidth in the interface.
>
>However I take advantage of your question to ask another (I saw a
>similar one but did not see the answer). In the following policy map:
>
>policy-map overlap
> class IP
> bandwidth 150
> class UDP
> bandwidth 150
> class RTP
> bandwidth 150
>
>Where is RTP traffic classified???
>
>Cheers,
>Ato.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Aldo
>Sent: miircoles, 17 de marzo de 2004 17:36
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: class sequence in policy-map
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have a quick and simple question. Will appreciate any input on this:
>
>Does the sequence in which the classes appear in policy-map
>configuration affect the treatment for that class?
>
>e.g.
>
>policy-map policy-1
> class data
> police 1024000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
> class voice
> priority 512
>
>policy-map policy-2
> class voice
> priority 512
> class data
> police 1024000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
>
>Will there be any noticable performance difference when either one is
>applied to an interface? Does the Doc CD mention anything on this?
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>=====
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:33 GMT-3