From: HP-France,ex2 ("SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 14:05:52 GMT-3
Hi Aldo,
With this policy map you are limiting bandwidth for data and reserving
bandwidth for voice. These actions are completely compatible and the order
does not affect the behaviour. In fact, limiting data would help voice to go
through, but not the other way around. Anyway when you use MQC each class
goes in a different queue and the only conflict comes when the total
bandwidth reserved for the classes exceeds the reservable bandwidth in the
interface.
However I take advantage of your question to ask another (I saw a similar
one but did not see the answer). In the following policy map:
policy-map overlap
class IP
bandwidth 150
class UDP
bandwidth 150
class RTP
bandwidth 150
Where is RTP traffic classified???
Cheers,
Ato.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Aldo
Sent: miircoles, 17 de marzo de 2004 17:36
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: class sequence in policy-map
Hi All,
I have a quick and simple question. Will appreciate any input on this:
Does the sequence in which the classes appear in policy-map configuration
affect the treatment for that class?
e.g.
policy-map policy-1
class data
police 1024000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
class voice
priority 512
policy-map policy-2
class voice
priority 512
class data
police 1024000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
Will there be any noticable performance difference when either one is
applied to an interface? Does the Doc CD mention anything on this?
Thanks!
=====
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:32 GMT-3