Re: OSPF: non-backbone areas

From: Packet Man (ccie2b@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 11 2004 - 15:20:39 GMT-3


Thanks, Rick, for your response. I appreciate it.

Out of curiosity, since it doesn't seem to matter what the number is of
non-backbone areas, do you know what role the area number plays within an
OSPF network?

thanks again, pm

>From: rick@iptool.net
>Reply-To: rick@iptool.net
>To: "Packet Man" <ccie2b@hotmail.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: OSPF: non-backbone areas
>Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:12:37 -0600 (CST)
>
>That configuration is perfectly OK. You can have multiple areas if you
>want as long as they are all connected to Area 0 in some fashion(directly
>or virtually) and they CAN all be area 1 if you want or any area for that
>matter.
>
>Rick
>
>
>
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > What issues or problems will there be with the following topology?
> >
> > R1 Area 1 R2 Area 0 R3 Area 1 R4
> >
> > I configured this topology by mistake, but couldn't find any routing
> > problems as a result. Everything worked fine, but it still doesn't seem
> > right. Aside from this probably being a very poor network design, are
> > there technical problems that could result from this configuration?
> >
> > Thank in advanced, pm
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Fast. Reliable. Get MSN 9 Dial-up - 3 months for the price of 1!
> > (Limited-time Offer)
> > http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:17 GMT-3