From: MADMAN (dmadlan@qwest.com)
Date: Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:50:07 GMT-3
Messina, John V wrote:
>>I believe. If you don't include the "fabric-enabling
>>module", the WS-X6348-RJ45V will not utlize the fabric
>>backplane and will operate with the same performance of the
>>WS-6148-RJ45V.
>
>
>
>
> True, except I believe if you have the SUP-720 which eliminates the need
> for the use of the fabric modules.
Yes the 720 has the SFM built into it hence you do not install the
720's in slots 1 and 2.
Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John V. Messina
> Network Engineer
> Crimson Technologies Inc.
> 516-390-3425
> 1-877-RED-1997
> john@crimsoncti.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Wygand [mailto:KWygand@customonline.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:46 AM
> To: Masoud, Alaa; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: What is the difference??!!
>
> The WS-X6348-RJ45V is a fabric enabled blade supporting 256gbps in the
> backplane, while the WS-X6148-RJ45V is not fabric enable and runs at
> 32gbps in the backplane. Furthermore, there is a single ASIC on the
> WS-X6148-RJ45V that allows 1GBPS throughput total for each "chunk" of
> ports assigned to that ASIC. There are 6 ASICs (1-8, 9-16, 17-24,
> 25-32, 33-40 and 41-48), so each of these ranges are oversubscribed with
> the maximum transfer speed of all 8 associated ports being 1gpbs. Also,
> if you run an etherchannel on this blade, the aggregate bandwidth of the
> etherchannel is limited to 1gbps. This is listed under the release
> notes for the blade. The WS-X6348-RJ45V, aside from being much more
> expensive, is not subject to ANY of these limitations and each port can
> operate at full wire speed on every port simultaneously. However, you
> also need to put another "fabric-enabling module" into the chassis to
> realize the benefits of this blade which is also very expensive from
> what !
> I believe. If you don't include the "fabric-enabling module", the
> WS-X6348-RJ45V will not utlize the fabric backplane and will operate
> with the same performance of the WS-6148-RJ45V.
>
> Please check with Cisco to verify any of this, but from MANY MANY phone
> calls and conversations with them, this is the information I was able to
> attain.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Masoud, Alaa
> Sent: Thu 3/11/2004 5:10 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc:
> Subject: What is the difference??!!
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm building configuration for 6509 BB. I need to insert a
> 10/100 inline power module. I found these exact same two with different
> prices. Would anyone know what the difference between them is??!!
>
> WS-X6348-RJ45V
> Catalyst 6500 48-port 10/100, Inline Power, RJ-45
> WS-X6148-RJ45V
> Catalyst 6500 48-port 10/100 Inline Power, RJ-45
>
> Alaa.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:17 GMT-3