From: alsontra@hotmail.com
Date: Tue Mar 09 2004 - 07:09:37 GMT-3
Would you want police or shape? Although policing would keep your servers
utilization 256k, wouldn't shaping provide you with smoother traffic
patterns, in addition to less packet loss??? Rookie question, I know. :-)
Alsontra
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Greenlee" <marvingreenlee@yahoo.com>
To: "Ahmed Mustafa" <ahmed.mustafa@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: QOS for real scenerio
> For assigned maximum bandwidth, you can use the police
> command.
>
> Policy-map GURANTEED
> class QOS
> police 256000 8000 exceed-action drop
>
> Port numbers will give you more granularity for the
> traffic you are limiting.
>
> Assuming that you want the QoS for the link between
> the server and the clients, you will need to configure
> it on both sides.
>
> Sincerely,
> Marvin Greenlee
> Network Learning, Inc
> Senior Technical Advisor
>
> --- Ahmed Mustafa <ahmed.mustafa@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > I am working on a real scenerio where specfically
> > asked for assigned bandwidth
> > 256K for ip address 172.16.10.1 (Running as an
> > application server) regardless
> > of congestion.
> >
> > If I configure CBWFQ where I can assign bandwidth:
> >
> > Router (Where Application Server)
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > access-list 100 permit ip host 172.16.10.1 any
> >
> > class-map QOS
> > match access-group 100
> >
> > Policy-map GURANTEED
> > class QOS
> > bandwidth 256
> >
> > int s0/0:0
> > service-policy output GURANTEED.
> >
> >
> >
> > Remote Router (Where hosts are)
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > access-list 100 permit ip any host 172.16.10.1
> >
> > class-map QOS
> > match access-group 100
> >
> > Policy-map GURANTEED
> > class QOS
> > bandwidth 256
> >
> > int s0/0:0
> > service-policy output GURANTEED.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > The above QOS only occurs incase of congestion.
> >
> > What QOS can be configured regardless of
> > congestion, and always gurantee
> > bandwidth 256KB only. When I Say 256KB only I mean
> > it shouldn't exceed 256KB
> > regardless of bandwidth availble or not.
> >
> >
> > In access-list, will port numbers make any huge
> > difference. It's an old
> > application and port# is not known unless we through
> > sniffer.
> >
> >
> > Should QOS configurations apply both ways as I am
> > mentioning above, or on a
> > router only where the application server is.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your
> > study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
> http://search.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:16 GMT-3