From: Bola Adegbonmire (bolaccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:57:25 GMT-3
I guess the vague wording is one of the reasons it is so confusing. I quite agree with you about the caveat with RIP (where passive interfaces does not actually stop advertisements)
Now Lee has a different opinion about it referring to incoming adverts, though I strongly disagree with this. I am of the oopinion that it must be referring to the behaviour of the local device as it relates to its own generated adverts.
Rgds,
Bola
"SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)" <antonio.sanchez-monge@hp.com> wrote:
Ooopss...
I was wrong, passive-interface default would block all advertisements only
for EIGRP but would not block RIP incoming updates. For RIP you need to do
it with access-lists, distribute-lists, vlan-maps, distance command,
offset-lists...
Cheers,
Ato.
-----Original Message-----
From: SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)
Sent: viernes, 05 de marzo de 2004 12:13
To: 'Bola Adegbonmire'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: CCIE Wording interpretation
Hi Bola,
Yes, I think you're right (passive-interface default).
Cheers,
Ato.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bola Adegbonmire [mailto:bolaccie@yahoo.com]
Sent: viernes, 05 de marzo de 2004 11:43
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CCIE Wording interpretation
Hi All,
this is a practice lab question and I am trying to be sure of interpretation
configure rip such that the default behaviour is to deny all advertisements
configure eigrp such that the default behaviour is to deny all
advertisements
I am wondering how to interprete these two questions - Is it referring to a
passive interface default config and then enabling specific interfaces or
what?
rgds,
Bola
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:14 GMT-3