RE: PIX vs. Checkpoint

From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 15 2004 - 16:03:48 GMT-3


At 09:44 AM 2/15/2004, Richard L. Pickard wrote:
>CheckPoint's customer service absolutly SUCKS !!!

netscreen comes to mind.

>Richard
>CCIE# 12388
>
>//
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: SANCHEZ-MONGE,ANTONIO (HP-France,ex2)
>[mailto:antonio.sanchez-monge@hp.com]
>Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 7:16 AM
>To: 'Richard L. Pickard'; Wright, Jeremy
>Subject: RE: PIX vs. Checkpoint
>
>
>Agree,
>
>Checkpoint seems to have placed a "block all" firewall to access their
>customer service, even if you pay for it.
>
>Product quality is another issue, and I heard the rumour that Cisco is
>planning to move everything to IOS, so good old PIX may become end of life
>in a few years, who knows...
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard L. Pickard [mailto:nettable_walker@comcast.net]
>Sent: sabado, 14 de febrero de 2004 0:32
>To: Wright, Jeremy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: PIX vs. Checkpoint
>
>
>All you have to do is deal w/ CheckPoint once to learn how much their
>customer service sucks !
>
>Richard
>CCIE# 12388
>
>//
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Wright, Jeremy
>Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 2:52 PM
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: OT:PIX vs. Checkpoint
>
>
> > Any recommendations between the 2 for an enterprise solution? The docs
>I've read has them pretty close. High availability, load balancing, and
>manageability are key.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *****************************************
> > Jeremy Wright
> > CCIE# 11168
> > Network Engineer
> > Archer Daniels Midland
> > wright@admworld.com
> > (217)451-4063
> >
> > *****************************************
> >
> >
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
>confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
>responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
>hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>communication is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
>immediately by email reply or by telephone and immediately delete this
>message and any attachments. In the U.S. call us toll free at (800)
>637-5843.
> Spanish, French, French (Canada), Portuguese, Polish, German, Dutch,
>Turkish, Russian, Japanese and Chinese:
>http://www.admworld.com/confidentiality.htm.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:50 GMT-3