RE: What pim mode should I make multicast loopbacks?

From: McCallum, Robert (robert.mccallum@thus.net)
Date: Sun Feb 15 2004 - 11:43:21 GMT-3

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Access-list for DLSW port numbers."
• Previous message: Richard L. Pickard: "RE: PIX vs. Checkpoint"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Snyder: "What pim mode should I make multicast loopbacks?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Well you just answered your own question.

Robert McCallum
CCIE #8757 R&S
01415663448
07818002241

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com]
> Sent: 15 February 2004 14:27
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: What pim mode should I make multicast loopbacks?
>
>
> In order to use the loopback address as a RP, you have to put
> an ip pim mode on the interface.
>
> Question, which one?
>
> I've used sparse-dense-mode, and I've used sparse mode.
> Couldn't tell the difference.
>
> Sparse mode makes more sense.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: Access-list for DLSW port numbers."
• Previous message: Richard L. Pickard: "RE: PIX vs. Checkpoint"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Snyder: "What pim mode should I make multicast loopbacks?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:50 GMT-3