From: Tim Fletcher (groupstudy@fletchmail.net)
Date: Wed Feb 11 2004 - 20:57:46 GMT-3
Does R2 have a route to 65.169.9.129/25? If not, when it gets the response, it won't know what to with it, and will drop it.
-Tim Fletcher
At 02:23 PM 2/10/04, Brian Feeny wrote:
>R1
>---------------
>interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 65.166.193.4 255.255.255.0 secondary
> ip address 65.169.9.129 255.255.255.128
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> standby 1 ip 65.166.193.1
> standby 1 priority 105
> standby 1 preempt
> standby 1 track Serial0/0
>
>
>R2
>----------------
>interface FastEthernet0/0
> description To LAN
> ip address 65.166.193.5 255.255.255.0
> no ip redirects
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> standby 1 ip 65.166.193.1
> standby 1 priority 100
> standby 1 preempt
>
>
>Ok, Host 65.169.9.130 wishes to send traffic to 204.127.128.1.
>65.169.9.130 has 65.169.9.129 as its gateway.
>
>R1 has a iBGP session to R2 and sees this:
>
>B 204.127.128.0/17 [200/0] via 65.166.193.5, 03:12:02
>
>Host 65.169.9.130 CANNOT reach its desired destination 204.127.128.1.
>
>Hosts on 65.166.193.0/24 can get out to 204.127.128.1 just fine
>using .1, .4, or .5 as gateways.
>
>The problem is related to outgoing packets. Assume incoming is fine
>(route 65.169.9.128/25 is being announced fine).
>
>
>Anyone got the answer?
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 e: signal@shreve.net
>Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709
>ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:48 GMT-3