From: Fowlie, Colin (Colin.Fowlie@aliant.ca)
Date: Mon Feb 09 2004 - 16:02:23 GMT-3
I would interpret "activated" as meaning the routing protocol is actively running on that interface (sending hellos/updates etc depending on protocol).
That being said, redistributing a connected route into a routing protocol would not violate this requirement, since the routing protocol would not be "activated" on the interface.
Colin Fowlie
#12757
-----Original Message-----
From: Prio utomo [mailto:rionaldi@cbn.net.id]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 2:48 PM
To: CCIE
Subject: Directly Connected Injection Rule
Hi,
I apologize that this question might already asked before, since I
confuse what "keyword" to find in the archive...
If it is being stated "Only one routing protocol can be activaated on
any interface. Do not actively run routing protocols on on an interface
if it is not necessary."
1. Will this rule be broke if we redistribute all connected interfaces
to several routing protocol in the same router.
The reason I asked question 1, I am facing weird situation that forcing
me to redistribute all connected interface interface to several routing
protocol... like being posted of from several colleague
R1 S0--------------S0 R2 S1------------S0 R3
R1 S0 and R2 S0 in OSPF
R2 S1 and R3 S0 in EIGRP
mutual redistribution happen in R2, and R1 cannot ping R2 S1 interface.
I can resolve this by redistributed connected int to EIGRP and OSPF..
Regards,
Rio
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:48 GMT-3