Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!

From: wwwjjang@chol.com
Date: Mon Jan 26 2004 - 08:11:26 GMT-3

• Next message: Church, Chuck: "RE: CBAC and IPsec in R&S lab?"
• Previous message: Szabo, Vilmos: "RE: NBAR with class based policing"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "RE: Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!"
• Maybe reply: kasturi cisco: "RE: Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!"
• Maybe reply: Arvind Yadav: "Re: Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi..Evevryone..

I'm testing "the Dlsw+ icannotreach saps",
But it doesnot work well..

What's the reason ??

--------
Diagram
--------

 PC-A--(E0 1.1.1.1)--R1-(S0 2.2.2.1)---(S0 2.2.2.2)--R2--(E0 3.3.3.1)-PC-B

---------
Question
--------
I wish that PC-A in R1 will not initiate netbios session to PC-B in
R2 ..

----------
My config
----------
R1>

----
dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2
dlsw bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
  bridge-group 1
-----
R2>
-----
dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.2
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.1
dlsw icannotreach sap F0 **
dlsw bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol ieee
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 3.3.3.1 255.255.255.0
 bridge-group 1
==> But When i searched the computer name of PC-B ,"PC-B", at PC-A
    I founded "PC-B" !!!
==> Because of the clause "dlsw icannotreach sap F0" in R2,
    I thought PC-B must not be finded by PC-A in R1 !!!
    What the reason ???    

• Next message: Church, Chuck: "RE: CBAC and IPsec in R&S lab?"
• Previous message: Szabo, Vilmos: "RE: NBAR with class based policing"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "RE: Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!"
• Maybe reply: kasturi cisco: "RE: Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!"
• Maybe reply: Arvind Yadav: "Re: Dlsw+ icannotreach's Question!!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:50 GMT-3