From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Sun Jan 18 2004 - 11:09:15 GMT-3
At 8:54 AM -0500 1/18/04, Ian Stong wrote:
>Not sure if it would work but you might try a tunnel between the area
>0's and then have one of them neighbor to your area 3.
>
One of the key things about this problem, which isn't clear to me in
the original post, is whether the goal is to have a single,
non-partitioned area 0.0.0.0, or if it is to have two area 0.0.0.0's.
If the latter, again some hints:
1. An OSPF domain consists of at least one area.
2. If there is more than one area, then one and only one area can
be 0.0.0.0. There can only be one area 0.0.0.0 per domain.
3. If you have multiple area 0.0.0.0s, you have more than one domain,
unless you can merge the areas. If you can't, what is the
general mechanism for exchanging routing information between
routing domains? (Routing domains can run the same or different
routing protocols)
4. The process ID is totally local to a router and is not the same
as a routing domain. You can, however, have a physical router
participate in more than one OSPF routing domain by having more
than one router ospf statement in its configuration. Each set
of router ospf and its subcommands will need a different process
ID.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:47 GMT-3