From: David Hiers (David_Hiers@adp.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 15:14:47 GMT-3
I strongly concur. You can expect to be required to do some pretty normal tasks. However, you'll have to do it with one hand tied behind your back and half the keyboard keys removedwhile skiing down a polar bear infested Olympic slalom course with a 837 strapped to each foot.
David
********************************************
David Hiers
CCIE, CISSP
ADP Dealer Services
2525 SW First Avenue
Portland, OR 97201
v: 503 402 3703
email: david_hiers@adp.com
********************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin Greenlee [mailto:marvingreenlee@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:25 PM
To: Ellie Chou
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: MQC vs. cq/pq
It is beneficial to know a variety of methods which
can be used to accomplish the same goal. It's better
to know too many ways to configure something than too
few.
Sincerely,
Marvin Greenlee CCIE #12237
Network Learning, Inc
marvin@eccie.com
--- Ellie Chou <ellie_chou@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I came across some documents saying that MQC is
> the new way of
> configuring QoS while CQ/PQ are the old ways. Do we
> still need to know
> about CQ/PQ for the lab exam? Are they basically
> achieving the same thing
> but just configured in a different way? thanks!
> Ellie
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Get real deals from brands you trust at MSN Offers.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:44 GMT-3