From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com)
Date: Sun Jan 11 2004 - 14:53:22 GMT-3
So, because the 192.168.4.4/32 is a different major network than the
interface that is sending it, it sends 192.168.4.0 without subnet info.
The receiving router gets the 192.168.4.0 update, and applies the
standard mask to it.
On the other hand, if the receiving router already had a 192.168.4.5/32
route, it won't accept the incoming route because the major network
existed in the routing table.
Do I have this basically correct?
Thanks for the URL.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Hays [mailto:nomad@gfoyle.org]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 11:01 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Any way to get rid of backbone ip ospf network
point-to-multipoint /32 routes?
you wrote:
>Any way to get rid of backbone ip ospf network point-to-multipoint /32
>routes?
NO.
>Why does version 1 rip round a /32 192.168.x.x loopback to a /24? I
>have no summary turned on. I understand this is a native
>class C route,
>but it doesn't summarize the class B network I'm also using. To me, no
>auto summary should mean no auto summary. Configs below.
>
The subnet of the interface sourcing or receivng the RIP v1 update is
the key.
You need to read this:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/54.html
HTH,
Jonathan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:39 GMT-3