From: Alec (clapun@graduate.hku.hk)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 12:57:57 GMT-3
I guess the dlsw load-balance circuit-count <value> is only applied for
remote-peer that are not explicitly configured with a circuit-weight value.
Is it perfectly alright that the circuit-weight value in the dlsw
remote-peer command not a multiple of the default value specified by the
dlsw load-balance command ?
alec
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'Xue Fei'" <xuefei@bgctv.com.cn>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: RE: how to set circuit weight of DLSw load balance
> As a note, 6 is only two times the weight of 3. :)
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Xue
> Fei
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:59 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: how to set circuit weight of DLSw load balance
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I check Document CD about that, but still no very clear...
> If I want traffic over link to remote-peer 10.1.1.1 three times of traffic
> to remote-peer 10.2.2.2, is that configuration right?
> Default circuit-weight is 3.
>
> dlsw load-balance circuit-count 3
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.2.2.2 circuit-weight 3 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp
> 10.1.1.1 circuit-weight 6
>
> Thanks!
>
> Xue Fei
> xuefei@bgctv.com.cn
> 2004-01-05
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:36 GMT-3