From: Brown, Jim (Jim.Brown@caselogic.com)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2004 - 12:47:43 GMT-3
The way I like to phrase the question to the proctors was....
After I implement this requirement what effect should it have, or what
should I see in the routing table.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:bsin@cox.net]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 5:14 PM
To: Jeff Nelson; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: lab restrictions/interpretations
Hi Jeff,
I have seen four R&S labs, and I can honestly say that I thought they
were
all very well written. Cisco evidently puts a lot of time and thought
into
them. When I saw something I thought was vague, I was able to get it
cleared
up by the proctor - try that route before spending too much time looking
for
a missing option. When presenting my question to the proctor, I often
got
the answer that I was "thinking too hard". In other words, the meaining
is
usually fairly straightforward.
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Nelson" <jnelson@rackspace.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: lab restrictions/interpretations
> There is a saying (I saw it written on the wall of a CCIE lab in
Houston)... something like "There are two ways to configure every
scenario;
for the CCIE LAB you must know all three."
>
> This is so because of the restrictions and conditions placed on each
lab
and scenario. Now, I know a little Cisco-ese, enough to find the
freesnacks
breakroom, but it seems like most "example" labs I've tried contradict
themselves. Like saying no static routes and then seeing a static mroute
in
configuration answers, or defining Policy Routing as any source-based
traffic manipulation and then using tunneling to overcome another
restriction, or tip toeing around the ol' 0.0.0.0 advertisement
restriction--justified because it was produced as a side-affect of
another
method..... Anyway, that is probably my biggest concern at this point,
queueing in on the one or two tag words that are supposed kick my brain
into
the right type of configuration. I don't want to be sitting there
digging
through the CD (wasting prescious time) looking for that 3rd way (that
may
or may not exist) because I believe that it can't be done in the ways I
know
due to the interpretive restrictions.
>
> Can anyone give me peace-of-mind on this?
>
> oh yes
> /rant
>
> --
> jeff
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:36 GMT-3