From: Marvin Greenlee (marvingreenlee@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 19:01:18 GMT-3
Well, since the title is "Routing and Switching", I
would expect a "Routing" item to have more weight than
an item that uses the underlying routing and
switching.
Regards,
Marvin Greenlee
--- David Porta <David.Porta003@msd.govt.nz> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am hammering away at IS-IS and before I spend too
> much time on that
> subject, I am curious as to how would you guys
> categorize IS-IS (without
> breaking the NDA offcourse).
>
> For example, do you think that IS-IS is as relevant
> to the lab exam as
> DLSW?, or would you say that IS-IS is as relevant to
> the exam as EIGRP?
>
> I am curious as to how much time people dedicate to
> this protocol when
> compared to other core subjects like OSPF or BGP.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> _______________________________
> David Porta
> Network Operations
> Ministry of Social Development
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> This email message and any attachment(s) is
> intended only for the
> person(s) or entity(entities) to whom it is
> addressed. The
> information it contains may be classified as IN
> CONFIDENCE and may be
> legally privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient any use,
> disclosure or copying of the message or
> attachment(s) is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this message in
> error please
> notify us immediately and destroy it and any
> attachment(s).
> Thank you. The Ministry of Social Development
> accepts no
> responsibility for changes made to this message or
> to any
> attachment(s) after transmission from the Ministry.
> -------------------------------
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:42 GMT-3