From: Pun, Alec CL (Alec.CL.Pun@pccw.com)
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 04:55:51 GMT-3
thanks guys.
rgds,
alec
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Hays [mailto:nomad@gfoyle.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:14 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ip helper-address
you wrote:
so that means the following pairs of command MUST be used together ?
thanks.
1) if default 8 ports are required
ip helper-address
ip forward-protocol udp
2) if additional udp port is required
ip helper-address
ip forward-protocol udp <new_port>
rgds,
alec
= = =
No.
The "ip forward-protocol" command is NOT necessary in case 1). I have
set up routers with only "ip helper-address" configured many, many
times. It works. I doubt you will take my word for it, so look at this
URL.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fipras_r/1rfipadr.htm#1018608
"The UDP destination port must be for TFTP, Domain Name System (DNS),
Time, NetBIOS, ND, BOOTP or DHCP packet, or a UDP port specified by the
ip forward-protocol udp global configuration command."
Carefully note the word "or" in the sentence above. If the desired
port(s) is in the "ip helper-address" list of ports then no "ip
forward-protocol" command need be configured.
Also, look at the example in the same URL:
"Examples
The following example defines an address that acts as a helper address:
interface ethernet 1
ip helper-address 121.24.43.2"
The "ip forward-protocol" command is used only if you need to forward a
port that is not in the standard "helper-address" ports, or disable
forwarding for one or more of the default "helper-address" ports.
HTH,
Jonathan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:41 GMT-3