From: Michael Whisenant (mwhisen@hiwaay.net)
Date: Sun Dec 14 2003 - 17:01:44 GMT-3
Yeah redistribute in your non-common IGP.
At 01:50 PM 12/14/2003, John Underhill wrote:
>I have a setup as follows, and I was wondering if there was any method aside
>from static routing which might work in this situation:
>
> R4
> /
> R2 ----R5
> \
> R6
>
>All routers are in different BGP ASs. R2 is the hub in a frame cloud. The
>spokes, R4, R5 and R6 each have a single mapping to the hub, and frame inverse
>arp is disabled on all interfaces. None of the routers are running a common
>IGP. Now I have the individual peerings between R2 and each of the spokes, and
>I thought that if I had R2 use next-hop-self and ebgp-multihop, that the
>spokes would be able to see each other via R2, but without the frame mappings,
>this is not happening. So I thought of advertising the networks in BGP, but in
>order to do that I would have to advertise the specific host address, ie
>12.1.1.4/32, and since that is not in the routing table it won't get
>advertised. The only way I can think of to get around this is perhaps policy
>routing or static routes, (but I'm not sure that would work either..) Am I
>missing something? Still not sure why next-hop-self didn't work.. Any ideas?
>Anyone??
>Thanks
>John
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:40 GMT-3