From: Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji) (OzgurG@garanti.com.tr)
Date: Sun Dec 14 2003 - 04:41:08 GMT-3
i dont think no arp frame-relay ever does something.
i did not see it preventing the router from ever replying to inverse-arp requestes.
so i dont think it will spoil anyting with auto-install,
did anybody seen it working?
Ozgur
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
JHays
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:21 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: FR inverse-arp
On the lab exam, the extra step of 'no arp frame-relay' is not
necessary. The 'no frame-relay inverse-arp' is enough to stop inverse
arp.
And just be aware when you use 'no arp frame-relay' that this will kill
autoinstall, which is a possible exam topic.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hoyle, Anthony (AL)
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 6:54 AM
To: 'Pun, Alec CL'
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: FR inverse-arp
Nope,
In addition, you may want to use "no arp frame-relay" also to
circumvent sending out ip address to DLCI binding information
From the router you are working on, works good for me
Anthony Hoyle
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Pun, Alec CL
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:15 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FR inverse-arp
Just want to confirm if "no frame-relay inverse-arp" is required on
frame-relay subinterface as well ?
tks
alec
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:40 GMT-3