From: Hoyle, Anthony (AL) (ALHoyle@dow.com)
Date: Fri Dec 12 2003 - 09:26:42 GMT-3
Yeah !! I forgot about that..hee hee hee. Thanks you're great*
Hoyle
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of JHays
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 7:21 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: FR inverse-arp
Importance: Low
On the lab exam, the extra step of 'no arp frame-relay' is not necessary. The 'no frame-relay inverse-arp' is enough to stop inverse arp.
And just be aware when you use 'no arp frame-relay' that this will kill autoinstall, which is a possible exam topic.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Hoyle, Anthony (AL)
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 6:54 AM
To: 'Pun, Alec CL'
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: FR inverse-arp
Nope,
In addition, you may want to use "no arp frame-relay" also to circumvent sending out ip address to DLCI binding information
From the router you are working on, works good for me
Anthony Hoyle
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Pun, Alec CL
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:15 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FR inverse-arp
Just want to confirm if "no frame-relay inverse-arp" is required on frame-relay subinterface as well ?
tks
alec
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:39 GMT-3