From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@wk.net)
Date: Wed Dec 10 2003 - 18:33:27 GMT-3
I wanted to run this by the group.
My standard bgp template
router bgp 200
no synchronization
bgp router-id 150.50.2.2
bgp log-neighbor-changes
distance bgp 190 200 200
no auto-summary
The reason I change the distance of bgp is because of routing loops I
keep getting due to peering to /32 loopbacks.
Can you think of a reason not to prefer igp routes verses bgp routes to
the same prefix? Nearly in all cases I don't want a route from bgp if
igp already has it.
On the other hand, if IGP doesn't have it, it gets installed into the
routing table anyway, even at distance 190.
Plus BGP isn't like IGP's, it doesn't care if it's in the routing table
or not.
I can't think of any problems with this, can you?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:39 GMT-3