RE: traceroute

From: Chris Cole (CCole@EPLUS.com)
Date: Wed Dec 10 2003 - 12:37:25 GMT-3


Ok the end host is a HP UX server. The path goes from a Microsoft 2K server
through a Cat 4505 to a Cisco router then a ATM connection to the remote
sides Cisco router. After that the end host ip address shows up as then next
four hops to the end host ip. I then did a trace back from the HP UX box to
the MS 2K serv and did not get the duplicate ip address. It's vary funney
every thing is working but the trace just shows up funney..

Thanks
ChrisC

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Wygand [mailto:KWygand@customonline.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Chris Cole; CCIELAB@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: traceroute

What type of host are you pinging? Is this a router or a network node
performing routing functionality? If so, I might have your answer.

Kenneth E. Wygand
Systems Engineer, Project Services
CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
Network+, A+
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
"Real Engineers Debug in Binary."
-kw

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Cole
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:19 AM
To: CCIELAB@groupstudy.com
Subject: OT: traceroute

Hello all, I have a question about reading the output of a traceroute. I
have done some research into this on the web and have not found a good
explanation. I did do a search on the Group study archives but the
explanation given would not apply here. Well I don't think it would. So
here
we go. I have a traceroute that has hops 4 - 7 the same IP address as
the
end host. I did notice the different in the Microsoft tracert and the
Unix
still traceroute. One ICMP One UDP. But I don't see how that could
explain
the multiple IP coming up in the traceroute. I can not give the real
trace.
It's for a customer. They are not having problems either with this link.
It
was just some thing that I have not seen and I would like some feed back
if
any body has seen this.

Thanks
ChrisC



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:38 GMT-3