From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Dec 08 2003 - 15:00:02 GMT-3
Hi all,
I'm trying to use MQC to set ip precedence but the router doesn't recongize
the set command.
Here's what I did:
ip cef
class ping
match 100
class trace
match 101
policy-map pingtrace
class ping
set ip precedence 5
^
% Unrecongized command
I'm running IOS 12.1 (11). Is that the problem? Or, might it be something
else?
Thanks, dt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@cox.net>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Cc: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco DQOS Book (was RE: CAR vs Police)
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for the recommendation. Yours is the second I have heard this week
> on this book. Just ordered it off bookpool.com for 37.50 including
> shipping.
>
> My only hesitation: the last book I heard raves about and ordered
(Solie's
> Practical Studies V2) was rather a disappointment (IMHO).
>
> -Bob Sinclair
> CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
> bsinclair@netmasterclass.net
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Cc: "'ccie2be'" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 4:14 PM
> Subject: Cisco DQOS Book (was RE: CAR vs Police)
>
>
> > I wanted to recommend the Odom & Cavanaugh book Cisco DQOS.
> >
> > It goes step by step, chapter by chapter over all the QOS tools. It
> > reads better than the CCO stuff, and its material isn't boiled down to
> > below ccnp level stuff. For example, I still haven't grasped all the
> > mechanisms behind the RED scheduling sequence numbers, thought I can use
> > it quite well now.
> >
> > Don't let the `IP Telephony Self-Study Exam Certification Guide
> > subtitle` throw you off, the authors repeatedly point out mistakes in
> > the Cisco Courseware, and test questions on the related exams. Such
> > things on how dual priority queues in a LLQ policy map really works; and
> > how cisco should have used the layer 2 trailer sizes in the codec
> > overhead tables, etc.
> >
> > I think it's in the same class as Parkhurst and Doyle, etc.
> >
> > More importantly, it filled to some missing knowledge for me that's not
> > covered in the standard CCIE library.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 2:26 PM
> > To: Bob Sinclair; Anas Tarsha; Group Study
> > Subject: Re: CAR vs Police
> >
> > Thank you for pointing out that link. I read it and it was very helpful.
> >
> > dt
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@cox.net>
> > To: "Anas Tarsha" <ra3i@yahoo.com>; "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>;
> > "Group
> > Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 9:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: CAR vs Police
> >
> >
> > > Anas,
> > >
> > > I would agree that Cisco could do a better job of explaining the
> > policing
> > > mechanism in the MQC, but I think I would disagree that it permits
> > buffering
> > > during congestion. There are Bc and Be parameters, but according to
> > the
> > > documentation this does not buffer packets to shape the traffic. The
> > best
> > > explanation I have found is at the link below, which says that the
> > policer
> > > does not buffer, but "drops packets less aggressively" during
> > congestion.
> > > Could you check it out and see what you think of it?
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_q_and_a
> > _item09186a00800cdfab.shtml#Q24
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -Bob Sinclair
> > > CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:37 GMT-3