From: rnasr (rnasr@s2n.com.au)
Date: Mon Dec 01 2003 - 12:40:48 GMT-3
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk207/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09487e.shtml
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Thomas Larus
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:17 AM
To: Eric Cables; ccielab
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IGP Redistribution scenario
That is a brilliant idea, since it serves as a useful reminder of the
potential for admin distance issues. I don't know if there is ever an end
to the learning when it comes to the very difficult subject of route
redistribution.
I love this list! You know there are people who are snobby about this list,
and join it and quickly leave it. They think they are too smart to benefit
from it, or think that it is bad that you can different answers to a
question here, and that, heaven forbid, one of the answers might be wrong.
Or they think that the list is somehow tainted by the presence of people who
don't seem to know enough at the start to be preparing for the CCIE Lab.
They may be right in some sense about some of the relative newcomers, but if
they leave because of these newcomers, it is their loss.
I could have gone a long time without ever thinking of your neat idea.
Sincerely,
Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014
Author of CCIE Warm-Up: Advice and Learning Labs
http://www.ipexpert.com/products_services/product.asp?sku=ip7777
tlarus@ipexpert.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Cables" <skatter@blackened.net>
To: "ccielab" <ccielab@cox.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: IGP Redistribution scenario
> That's a pretty big question. IGP redistribution is probably one of the
> harder aspects of the lab, and you can bet you'll run into problems.
>
> One method I like to use is redistribution with a route-map, and tag the
> routes with an easy to remember # so that it can be identified, and
> modified later based on that tag. Since you'd be redistributing with a
> route-map you also have the flexibility to modify metrics, etc..
>
> For example, you can tag the the routes based the IGP's administrative
> distance, which should be easy to remember...
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> --
> Eric Cables
>
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, ccielab wrote:
>
> > Is there any tried and true method to the approach for redistribution of
IGP
> > routing protocols in the lab.
> > Such as when you have a two point, mutual redistribution problem.
Should I
> > start with distributr lists on
> > both routing protocols, or adjusting administrative distance, I am
looking at
> > netmaster sample lab for example.
> > THanks
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:34 GMT-3