From: Mike Williams (ccie2be@swbell.net)
Date: Fri Nov 28 2003 - 18:12:28 GMT-3
Is there a particular reason for R1 to go through R2 to get to network
ABC? Since all three routers share the same segment, it seems it would
be best for R1 to also peer with R3 and learn the route directly. Even
if R1 and R3 don't peer, it still seems it would be best to have R1
learn the route for ABC with R3 as the next hop instead of R2.
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Richard Davidson
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:47 PM
To: groupstudy
Subject: rip nexthop
Scenario
-You have 3 routers all running rip unicast. The
routers include router 1, 2 and 3.
-Router 3 is neighbored with router 2 and 2 with
router 1.
-Each router is connected to the same broadcast
segment, configured on the same subnet.
-If router 3 sends network abc to router 2, the next
hop is router 3.
-Router 2 has split horizon disabled.
-If router 2 then sends network abc to router 1 the
next hop remains the address of router 3 and the hop
count increases by to two.
Question
-How can I make Router 2 send a rip update to router 1
with a next hop of router 2?
R1 R2
|_____________|
|
R3
|_network ABC
=====
Richard Davidson
Yahoo IM: r1davidson
e-mail rich@myhomemail.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:19 GMT-3