From: nettable_walker@comcast.net
Date: Fri Nov 28 2003 - 14:55:01 GMT-3
Can you send me the config's of the routers ?
Are all the routers on 12.2.x ?
This is something I have had mixed success with.
Thanks,
Richard
CCIE# 12388
//
> I was stuck on a problem yesterday, maybe someone has an idea..
>
> RIP --- OSPF area0 --area1 --- RIP
> Four rip routes were summarized on the first rip network to 192.168.0.0/22 and
> reditributed into ospf, as soon as the summary is applied, routes that were
> appearing in the second rip domain began to age out, (as expected). I tried
> creating a static route on the asbr and redistributing that into the second
> rip domain, but it doesn't show up, so I tried a secondary address with a /22
> bit mask between the asbr and the rip router and added that to rip, same,
> tried a tunnel, still the summary doesn't show up in the secondary rip domain.
> The only way I could make it work was by either adding 4 static routes to
> ospf, or advertising a default route into the rip domain. What I was wondering
> was, is this the expected behavior for a route that has been summarized
> downstream? Does anyone have a link to the tricks to use when adding routes
> with variable masks to a classful protocol, I searched cco, and the archives
> but haven't been able to find it, maybe I'm missing something..
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:19 GMT-3