From: Mike Williams (ccie2be@swbell.net)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 03:13:56 GMT-3
It seems that every time I've setup a variance for unequal load
balancing, I've had to clear ip route (I usually just clear ip route for
all routes cuz I'm lazy) and when it relearns the routes, it's setup for
balancing.......... Doesn't seem to wanna work until I do that clearing
of the routes tho......
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joe Chang
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:09 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: EIGRP load balancing
Kind of a silly suggestion: did you do a "clear ip route <ip of the
eigrp
route>". Maybe that will get the two paths to show up on the routing
route>table.
----- Original Message -----
From: "JamesGEF" <jamesgef@sympatico.ca>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 7:10 PM
Subject: EIGRP load balancing
> I could never get this to work. I have one router with two unequal
> EIGRP
EX
> paths to a destination. The FD is 261120 and the the distance through
> the
FS
> is 386560. Now, in my routing tables, I only have route the route
with
> distance 261120.
>
> If I read correctly, by entering the variance command, I would
load-balance
> over unequal paths. If I enter variance 2 under my router
> configuration, shouldn't the router place both routes in my routing
> tables as 386560 is
less
> than 2x261120?
>
> As CCO states for the variance command: "The multiplier times the
> local
best
> metric for the destination must be greater than or equal to the metric
through
> the next router"
>
> Looking for clarification...
>
> James
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:17 GMT-3