RE: CAR vs Service policy

From: William Boye (wboye@tiscali.ch)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 13:45:15 GMT-3


With class based policing you have three actions (conform - exceed -
violate) while you have only two with CAR (rate-limit... conform - exceed)
There is an excellent document on it on cisco homepage:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
0d7276.shtml

Regards, William

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Tony Singh (A)
Sent: Dienstag, 25. November 2003 16:19
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CAR vs Service policy

Hi All

What is the difference between rate-limiting direct on the interface
and using a service policy????/

Example 1

interface fastethernet 0/0

description 45Mbps to R2

rate-limit output access-group 101 8000 2000 4000 conform-action
set-prec-transmit 5 exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0

ip address 10.1.0.9 255.255.255.0

Example 2

class-map match-all acgroup2

  match access-group 101

!

!

policy-map police

  class acgroup2

     police 8000 2000 4000 conform-action set-prec-transmit 5
exceed-action set-prec-transmit 0

       interface fastethernet 0/0

       service-policy input police

interface fastethernet 0/0

service-policy output police

Tony

Anesh Singh (A)
SinghA1@telkom.co.za

Powered by Plaxo <http://www.plaxo.com/signature/>

Want a signature like this? <http://www.plaxo.com/signature/>

[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image001.gif]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:17 GMT-3