From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 19:39:32 GMT-3
At 5:25 PM -0500 11/19/03, Martin D. Fierbaugh wrote:
>One possible way to solve it may be not to include the network statement in
>ospf, use a neighbor statement across the link, then redistribute connected
>and filter with a route map.
>
>Marty
Without having tried this, I like it. It introduces a Type 5 LSA,
where the true requirement for consistent LSDB's is for the Types 1
and 2 used in the Dijkstra computation.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:20 PM
>To: hcb@gettcomm.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: Filtering specific LSA's in OSPF
>
>
>I'm trying to hide the existence of a specific subnet via a specific source.
>I still need R1 to have the route, just not if the link between R5 and R3 is
>down. All my research tells me the same things you have just said. I'll
>have to figure out some other way to do this. Thanks, Howard.
>
>Danny
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:hcb@gettcomm.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:24 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Filtering specific LSA's in OSPF
>
>
>At 10:43 AM -0500 11/19/03, Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com wrote:
>>Hey, Group. Does anyone know of a way to filter specific LSA from
>>leaving or coming into a router. I'm having an issue in our production
>>network. I know you can do the "database-filter-all out" and the
>>"neighbor database-filter", but it blocks everything. I'm looking for
>>something similar to what EIGRP can do with dist-lists. I can do a
>>distribute-list in and keep it from being installed in the routing
>>table of the router and this works fine, but the LSA still comes in and
>>gets sent downstream to other neighbors. Any ideas?
>>
>
>I'd ask immediately "what issue are you having in the production network?"
>
>If you think you are having a problem with router performance due to
>too many LSAs, the proper solution may be to split up your areas or
>use routers with faster processors.
>
>If you are trying to hide the existence of a specific subnet, OSPF
>simply isn't designed to do that. When I have to do that sort of
>thing, or to specify a special traffic-engineered preferred paths, I
>normally use static routes in addition to OSPF. Such static routes
>are never redistributed into OSPF, being filtered out during
>redistribution if other static routes do need to be given to OSPF.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:14 GMT-3