From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Nov 15 2003 - 14:37:58 GMT-3
I've checked the 3550 documentation and didn't see anything regarding the
need to change MTU for OSPF or any other routing protocol for adjacencies to
properly form. Is this problem specific MTU size documented anywhere or is
this something that you had best just know.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "seonghui" <seonghui@vads.com>
To: "'Silvio Nunes'" <silvio_98@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: OSPF - MTU mismatch
> global command --> system MTU 1500
>
> follow by a reload
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Silvio Nunes
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 11:06 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF - MTU mismatch
>
>
> Group,
>
> When I try to establish an relationship between Interface Vlan1 (Cat 3550)
> and Ethernet0 (R1) in OSPF, the relationship can not be form because the
MTU
> is different:
> Interface Vlan1 - MTU Size 1504 bytes
> Ethernet 0 - MTU Size 1500 butes
>
> When I put the command IP OSPF IGNORE-MTU for each interface, everything
> works fine.
>
> Is there another way to do the same thing ?
>
> Considering that there is not the command MTU xx for interface Vlan..
>
> Regards,
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Messenger: converse com os seus amigos online.
> http://messenger.msn.com.br
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:12 GMT-3