From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Wed Nov 12 2003 - 12:07:31 GMT-3
If they do not specifically say "make sure your solution will work for just
one extension", don't assume that is what they meant. Reading too deep into
the question will get you in trouble. Keep it simple. You do not get extra
bonus points for creativity. When in doubt, ask the proctor.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jonathan V Hays
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:49 AM
To: easproni@cisco.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: VOIP num-exp or translate ?
Thanks, Enrico. I knew that num-exp would work. However, the num-exp is
a global solution and would work for any phone on the router.
I used the "translate" solution because I thought it was a more specific
solution and would meet the requirements more specifically. That is,
with the "translate" solution you cannot pickup any other phone and dial
5 and get a translation to 6001. But perhaps I was overanalyzing.
As you say, the real question is whether the "translate" solution
actually works. Since I don't have VOIP or phones in my home lab I am
stuck with trying it via "csim start" in a remote lab. And unfortunately
I can attest that "csim start" is very limited and does not seem to work
for testing this configuration.
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: easproni@cisco.com [mailto:easproni@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Jonathan V Hays
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: VOIP num-exp or translate ?
Jonathan,
With "this" I was referring to the num-exp solution which would fit
the requirement just fine. Personaly I've never seen the
"translate-outgoing"
implemented for local destination (on the same router), the only time
I've
seen it used was for voip called numbers ... I should try it on my lab
setup
though...
brgds,
Enrico
Jonathan V Hays wrote:
> In your reply, does "this" refer to the "num-exp" solution, the
> "translate" solution or both?
>
> Regardless, my answer was incorrect.
Jonathan V Hays wrote:
>
> Requirement: When someone dials 5 on the phone connected to 1/0/0 the
> number configured on 1/0/1 (6001) should be called.
>
> My answer:
>
> dial-peer voice 10 pots
> destination-pattern 6000
> port 1/0/0
> translate called 1
> !
> dial-peer voice 20 pots
> destination-pattern 6001
> port 1/0/1
> !
> translation-rule 1
> rule 0 ^5 6001
>
> This was the wrong answer. Should I have configured "num-exp 5 6001"
> instead?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:11 GMT-3